The Valence Family History

This is a site where you can find information about the history of the Valence family.

To change to another surname: A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | I | J | K | L | M | N | O | P | Q | R | S | T | U | V | W | X | Y | Z

The Valence Family in the Census

Census Freqency of the Surname Valence
1841 Census 41
1851 Census 10
1861 Census 28
1871 Census 19
1891 Census 8

Most Frequent Forenames for the Valence Family in the Census

Name 1841 Census 1851 Census 1861 Census 1871 Census 1891 Census Total
WILLIAM Valence 1 3 3 2 0
ELIZABETH Valence 2 1 1 3 0
ELIZA Valence 2 0 0 1 1
GEORGE Valence 2 0 0 0 1
LILIAN Valence 0 0 0 0 1
NAOMI Valence 0 0 0 0 1
SAMUEL Valence 0 0 0 0 2
STANLEY A Valence 0 0 0 0 1
WILLIAM G Valence 0 0 0 0 1
ANN Valence 1 0 2 0 0
ANNA Valence 1 0 0 0 0
CHARLES Valence 2 0 0 1 0
DAVID Valence 1 0 0 0 0
EDMOND Valence 1 0 0 0 0
EDMUND Valence 1 0 0 0 0
EDWARD Valence 1 0 0 0 0
ELLEN Valence 1 0 1 0 0
HANNAH Valence 2 0 0 0 0
HENRY Valence 2 0 0 1 0
JAMES Valence 2 0 0 0 0

Etmology and History of the Surname: Valence

Search for the etymology and history of the surname Valence (information provided by www.BehindTheName.com).

Your Family History Search

You can use the forms below to do automatic searches for the Valence family online amongst birth, marriage and death records from 1837, plus census transcripts for 1841, 1851, 1861, 1871, 1891 and 1901


 



'The War Illustrated' - Product Review by Sean Brady
The original magazine was a 'weekly picture-record of events by land, sea and air' of the First World War.

 

Possible Pitfalls in Using the Census
Many people don't realise that the census page images we see are actually transcripts of the household census forms, the details were copied into the books by the enumerators.

 

An Unauthorised Visit to the Front
A short article on a war correspondant's journey to the front, from The War Illustrated magazines.

 

1911 Census to be released early
From 2009, a fully-indexed 1911 census will be online, three years earlier than family historians expected!